The Joseph Effect: The Buildup To Enslavement

What is The Joseph Effect? It is a phrase that I coined to illustrate the statutes made by Joseph during the famine. These statutes saved the lives of the people, and ensured that Egypt would continue to benefit in the future. However, long after Joseph’s death, there would be a change in leadership, within Egypt.

In Genesis 47:13-27 we are told about the statutes Joseph made to ensure the survival of the people of Egypt and the tribe Israel. Joseph’s statutes would see a prosperity in the land of Egypt, which ended in the explosive growth of the nation of Israel. It was not until well after the death of Joseph that Egypt would forget about Joseph’s role in the nation’s survival.

And as with any group that has been given favorable treatment (Genesis 47:12), the tribe of Israel became comfortable in the land of Goshen. The policies Joseph enacted in fulfilling the dream given to both him and Pharaoh would lead to Egypt to becoming a powerful nation. With the passage of time, Egypt would no longer be the international power it once was.

After Joseph’s passing (Genesis 50:26), the nation of Israel stayed in the land Goshen. Joseph knew that, under his brothers leadership, Israel was not ready to go back to the land of that God had set aside for them (Genesis 50:24).

Thus, he was given a prophesy. He told those who would hear that God would send someone to bring them and his body back to the land (Genesis 50:25). God would indeed ensure that the nation of Israel would grow both in number, and in strength.

“Now, there arose a new king over Egypt, who did not know Joseph.” Exodus 1:8 is an ominous verse. It marks the end of peace that the tribe of Israel had with the people of Egypt.

If one were to truly analyze Joseph’s statutes, they would realize that his statutes set the stage for the enslavement of the tribe of Israel. I have coined the phrase The Joseph Effect to illustrate how Joseph’s policies, which were meant for good, were used as a control and a tool of manipulation by the new Pharaoh. The following video will provide context of how the same statues in Joesph’s day are being used today.

The Joseph Effect: Bread and Circus

Mission Statement

Many christians do not possess the ability make an apologetic defense for their faith. This is made clear, when they are challenged. They don’t know how to give a defense.
This is a failure of the church. You may ask, “how do you know this?” Simple, I have been told for there decades, “you can’t argue someone into heaven!”
Just as Scripture is taken out of context so too has the definition of argument. An apologetic answer is not the same as an angry disagreement. But, they are being taught as one in the same.
This is the call the LORD placed on me. 2Timothy415 is about equipping for a defense, to counter myths, and itching ears.
Preach the Word
2Ti 4:1 I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom:
2Ti 4:2 preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching.
2Ti 4:3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions,
2Ti 4:4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.
2Ti 4:5 As for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.
May the LORD see it through to completion.

Secrets and Lies

The war with Russia has escalated right as Moderna was caught having a 2016 gene sequence inserted in the COVID virus. This gene sequence is not a natural event. It is long since past time for Big Pharma and their allies to be held accountable for their violations of the Nuremberg Code.

The following is the address for reading the code for yourself. It needs to be read and understood.

Spirit Beings:The Santa Claus

The Deception

There are many deceptions being propagated in the world today. One of these deceptions is the the curious case of the modern Santa Claus. There are several interpretations of what the modern  Santa Claus is. 

Many are taught that this modern Santa Claus is the same or equal to the 4th century church father Nicholas of Bari, or Nicholas of Myra. However, with the passage of time, the knowledge of who this 4th century father was has transformed. With proper discernment, one can easily comprehend that the modern interpretation is a spirit being.

Spirit Being: Satanic Mimic

This modern Santa Claus may possess similar aspects of the early church father; however, the stories of the modern Santa Claus attribute his powers to that of pagan spirit beings and divine sources. The modern Santa Claus is said to possess the powers of omnipresence, omnipotence, omniscience, and has the ability to judge. 

One need only site the lyrics to songs written about this entity for a glimpse of how people perceive it. The song Santa Claus Is Coming To Town, for instance, has these aspects of its godlike ability. Here are the lines in question:

He’s making a list and checking it twice¬†

Gonna find out who’s naughty and nice (omnipresence)

He sees you when you’re sleepin’

He knows when you’re a wake

He knows if you’ve been bad or good (omniscience)

Now Santa is a busy man, He has no time to play

He’s got millions of stockings to fill on Christmas Day (omnipotence)

Each of these sets speak of a supernatural aspect of this being. The song speaks of an all knowing, ever present, all powerful, and loving being. These aspects are divine in nature, thus mimic the attributes of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.  

My thoughts:

Modern Josef Mengele: What The World Medical Community is Not Telling You

At the end of WWII, the world discovered the existent of the depravity of man. The world would call it a holocaust, but that was just the tip of the iceberg. Upon further investigation it was determined that far more atrocities were committed.

In 1947, the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg set up the 10 standards, in the hopes to rein in the depravity the medical and scientific communities were capable of committing. These standards are to be followed when conducting experiments on human subjects. These standards were accepted and codified worldwide.

These codes were instruct the medical and scientific communities to weigh the risk and benefit of their experiments. These codes were an attempt to avoid unnecessary pain and suffering. The Nuremberg Code has become the standard set of codes for medical practice worldwide.

The following is the Nuremberg Code’s 10 standards, in their entirety. As you read it, for yourself, reflect on the way the world medical community has implemented their polices in light of what is written. Do you notice the way they have violated the code?

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, 7 December 1996.

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. Theexperimentshouldbesodesignedandbasedontheresultsofanimal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.

8. Theexperimentshouldbeconductedonlybyscientificallyqualifiedpersons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. Duringthecourseoftheexperimentthehumansubjectshouldbeatlibertyto bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10.During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

Demons In The Pulpit: Supporting False Converts

It is now a matter of public record that former National Institute of Health director Francis Collins either presided over, ordered, funded, or indirectly participated in the following during his tenure:

Record-level spending on scientific experimentation performed on fetuses obtained from abortions

University of Pittsburgh experiment that, among other things, grafted infant scalps onto lab rats

Experiments on the harvested organs of aborted, full-term babies

Endorsement of unrestricted funding of embryonic stem cell research

Policies that exchanged merit-based grants for those partially determined by left-wing “diversity, equity, and inclusion” exams

Millions of dollars in taxpayer grants spent on transgender research on minors

Opposite-sex hormone treatments given to children as young as 8-years-old

Mastectomies performed on girls as young as 13-years-old

Millions of dollars in grants to an app program that tracked teenage boys’ homosexual activities including anal sex, all without parental knowledge.

It is also known that Collins personally attended former President Barack Obama’s celebratory signing of an Executive Order to undo a George W. Bush-era ban on scientific experiments done on human embryos, and acquiesced to the reality that the kind of genetic testing he promoted led to increased killing of Down Syndrome babies.