Spirit Beings:The Santa Claus

The Deception

There are many deceptions being propagated in the world today. One of these deceptions is the the curious case of the modern Santa Claus. There are several interpretations of what the modern  Santa Claus is. 

Many are taught that this modern Santa Claus is the same or equal to the 4th century church father Nicholas of Bari, or Nicholas of Myra. However, with the passage of time, the knowledge of who this 4th century father was has transformed. With proper discernment, one can easily comprehend that the modern interpretation is a spirit being.

Spirit Being: Satanic Mimic

This modern Santa Claus may possess similar aspects of the early church father; however, the stories of the modern Santa Claus attribute his powers to that of pagan spirit beings and divine sources. The modern Santa Claus is said to possess the powers of omnipresence, omnipotence, omniscience, and has the ability to judge. 

One need only site the lyrics to songs written about this entity for a glimpse of how people perceive it. The song Santa Claus Is Coming To Town, for instance, has these aspects of its godlike ability. Here are the lines in question:

He’s making a list and checking it twice 

Gonna find out who’s naughty and nice (omnipresence)

He sees you when you’re sleepin’

He knows when you’re a wake

He knows if you’ve been bad or good (omniscience)

Now Santa is a busy man, He has no time to play

He’s got millions of stockings to fill on Christmas Day (omnipotence)

Each of these sets speak of a supernatural aspect of this being. The song speaks of an all knowing, ever present, all powerful, and loving being. These aspects are divine in nature, thus mimic the attributes of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.  

My thoughts:

Modern Josef Mengele: What The World Medical Community is Not Telling You

At the end of WWII, the world discovered the existent of the depravity of man. The world would call it a holocaust, but that was just the tip of the iceberg. Upon further investigation it was determined that far more atrocities were committed.

In 1947, the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg set up the 10 standards, in the hopes to rein in the depravity the medical and scientific communities were capable of committing. These standards are to be followed when conducting experiments on human subjects. These standards were accepted and codified worldwide.

These codes were instruct the medical and scientific communities to weigh the risk and benefit of their experiments. These codes were an attempt to avoid unnecessary pain and suffering. The Nuremberg Code has become the standard set of codes for medical practice worldwide.

The following is the Nuremberg Code’s 10 standards, in their entirety. As you read it, for yourself, reflect on the way the world medical community has implemented their polices in light of what is written. Do you notice the way they have violated the code?

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, 7 December 1996.

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. Theexperimentshouldbesodesignedandbasedontheresultsofanimal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.

8. Theexperimentshouldbeconductedonlybyscientificallyqualifiedpersons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. Duringthecourseoftheexperimentthehumansubjectshouldbeatlibertyto bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10.During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

Demons In The Pulpit: Supporting False Converts

It is now a matter of public record that former National Institute of Health director Francis Collins either presided over, ordered, funded, or indirectly participated in the following during his tenure:


Record-level spending on scientific experimentation performed on fetuses obtained from abortions

University of Pittsburgh experiment that, among other things, grafted infant scalps onto lab rats

Experiments on the harvested organs of aborted, full-term babies

Endorsement of unrestricted funding of embryonic stem cell research

Policies that exchanged merit-based grants for those partially determined by left-wing “diversity, equity, and inclusion” exams

Millions of dollars in taxpayer grants spent on transgender research on minors

Opposite-sex hormone treatments given to children as young as 8-years-old

Mastectomies performed on girls as young as 13-years-old

Millions of dollars in grants to an app program that tracked teenage boys’ homosexual activities including anal sex, all without parental knowledge.


It is also known that Collins personally attended former President Barack Obama’s celebratory signing of an Executive Order to undo a George W. Bush-era ban on scientific experiments done on human embryos, and acquiesced to the reality that the kind of genetic testing he promoted led to increased killing of Down Syndrome babies.


Evangelism: We Are All Called

Evangelism means announcing the good news of Christ’ death, burial, resurrection, and ascension. Discipleship is the task of training believers to become mature followers of Christ, growing in their knowledge of, love for, and obedience to the Lord.

 Ed Smither, “The Church’s Work of Evangelism and Discipleship,” in Lexham Survey of Theology, ed. Mark Ward et al. (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2018).

It is easy for those whom do not have the will to “go and make disciple” to make it difficult for those who are called to “go.” They know that by the very existence of members of the church body who are actively going out into their communities it shows their true character and nature. Thus, every effort to go in to a local community is shutdown or sabotaged by those who claim to be the most righteous and holy.

Throughout the history of the church, evangelists (full‐time vocational preachers as well as committed laypeople) have approached Christian witness through a variety of means and contexts: from events such as open air “crusades” and small-group gatherings to personal relationships. Some have developed apologetics, offering a rational defense of Christian claims; others have mastered the art of dialogue, crossing religious and worldview boundaries in order to clarify the Christian message. Many have successfully proclaimed the good news by sharing their own faith story.

 Ed Smither, “The Church’s Work of Evangelism and Discipleship,” in Lexham Survey of Theology, ed. Mark Ward et al. (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2018).

Why is it so hard for church laypeople to express their faith to others? Is it that they find it difficult to speak before other, or is it that they have no testimony to give? Let us explore these questions.

The first question can be answered simply, fear. Fear is a powerful tool. Satan used that tool to have Peter deny Jesus.

One need only look to Peter as to how powerful fear can be. Jesus spoke about Peter’s denial. In the book of Luke Jesus says:

“Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you that our faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen you brothers.”

Luke 22:31-32 ESV

Thus, evangelism is not for the faint of heart. It is a calling that will have you speaking to hostel groups, or individuals. One must be called, equipped, and supported.

The following two videos speak to the equipping and calling. Greg Koukl of Stand to Reason and Paul Washer of HeartCry Missionary Society. We must all be ready to “Go!”

Sobering Truth About Today’s Church

The sad, simple, truth is that most churches are full of individuals that don’t possess any form of discernment. They refuse to move past the milk of Scripture. It’s equally depressing how the pastors they look to are their enablers.

It’s the same message. Jesus is loving, merciful, and forgiving. However, Jesus says He did not come to bring peace, but a sword (Matthew 10:34). They never hear about how Jesus will exact vengeance (2 Thessalonians 1:5-10), what their true nature is (Luke 11:37-52), and He will end it all in judgment (Jude 1:15).

We are all encouraged to grow (1 Timothy 4:15). We are all told to study the Scripture (1 Timothy 4:13 ). For the time is coming when they’ll fall to myths (2 Timothy 4:4).

If we are to avoid apostasy, then we must be honest about the full Gospel. We cannot not not stay stagnant. We cannot allow for Hebrews 5:11-14 to remain in the Church.

Heb 5:11  About this we have much to say, and it is hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing.

Heb 5:12  For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the basic principles of the oracles of God. You need milk, not solid food,

Heb 5:13  for everyone who lives on milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, since he is a child.

Heb 5:14 But solid food is for the mature, for those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil.